Wine ” Cabernet “Trademark dispute, fighting for nearly 8 years, playing complicated and confusing, many of the details, so the law, too professional, and also so long ago?? Has been pulled out of 70 years.

Recently that this naughty, quite large, I spent a bit more energy to study, study finally clear. It does not matter is not clear, a clear, also found that this is a big century, comparable to widely spread under the Water Margin “Li Gui,” posing “Li Kui.” But, then Li Gui only willing to secretly haunted, but today’s “Li Gui,” you can jump to the stage to the “Li Kui” “try sky high.” This is precisely what I want it to?? Fun.

This matter did not complex: 70 years ago, Changyu Grape Wine Factory invented a unique grape taste Wine , Named “Cabernet”, exclusive of 60 years; and several registered trademarks, still quite brand protection awareness. Until 10 years ago, the Great Wall Winery began producing wine, what name? Feel that “Cabernet” Yes, well-known in the market, also with it. With the use of the Changyu Winery quit, not to use the; the Great Wall were not done, refused to quit, have been common, and you should let it confiscated for “Cabernet,” a common name ah … …

Sounds ridiculous, in fact, that simple.

However, I still want to pursue this simple behind the “simple”?? Why the veritable “Li Gui,” can be reported to the palace, “Li Kui”?

In fact, this is a historical origin. 70 years ago, I believe Changyu is registered, “Cabernet” trademark?? Please you to check information on the proceedings, it can always find some clues. 60 years ago, the liberation, all in the past to re-register a trademark of All?? Attention, re-registration, is Honored They can take home the old trademark, the trademark is not all “confiscated” the.

Zhangyu business originally private company, be regarded as trials to 50 years starting from the last century three separate occasions to the State Trademark Bureau “Cabernet” trademark applications for registration, until this century in 2002, finally got my trademark. This is what could be in trouble, then there are the Great Wall were also dozens of wineries were using “Cabernet”, so re-registered successfully Changyu, Great Wall, which means they can not use the “Cabernet,” the trademark the. Great Wall have indiscriminate investments in droves to protest, “above” this registration will soon be dismissed; the withdrawal, Changyu and certainly not dry, but also to protest, this protest is 6 years, in 2008, Changyu finally has triumphed; the Great Wall were not done, the appeal to the court, the judges state business. The court held that the Great Wall to provide a lot of new evidence that “Cabernet” is not Zhangyu family, Changyu has provided much new evidence, that “Cabernet” from “ancient times” is “our house”, and then forget it, simply go to the judges or by the business, “BIA” it … …

Something so simple? Really that simple! If you think this story is complicated, so I resort to a metaphor we are most familiar. A 70-year old one, the times they change, to the chaos of the times, old one of “being” admitted to many people, it was discovered after the old house by the door, hall door, back door, was a most convenient diameter, so We will from this way through the aisle. Then again, old one, and the younger generation that this house is our house, and you walk around, I is not convenient ah, so that it will close the path to be the neighborhood are anxious, I step on the road more than a dozen years, and on what basis that this road is your home, ah! Take your real estate license then come! Year’s real estate license to find out, but not useful?? Liberation of real estate license is not a comprehensive and balanced Moreover, this route can not walk, can not live in the old house, this is not the loss of everyone’s interests? ?? That it is time everyone?? It “universal” it!

Result, “Li Gui” were on the downtown court.

I would like to venture to ask is, if your home quickly moved into the old one because some people would be asked to forfeiture, would you like? Reasonable and unreasonable? If the answer is no, Is Changyu’s “Cabernet” on the forfeiture? On the “universal”?

Disengagement of these disputes, I think that this thing, regardless of outcome, are tragic.